Talk:Documentation list-Software - Revision history

Mike: /* Two ND-60.204 in the list */ new section

2009-09-27T13:14:05Z

Two ND-60.204 in the list: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:14, 27 September 2009
Line 10:		Line 10:
	:Hmm. Group them together describing both documents, with their differences or two separate sections, each describing the difference between each other. The documentations lists have been "designed" as the needs have increased. Maybe it's time to do some rework? /[[User:Mike\|Mike]] 19:56, 22 September 2009 (UTC)		:Hmm. Group them together describing both documents, with their differences or two separate sections, each describing the difference between each other. The documentations lists have been "designed" as the needs have increased. Maybe it's time to do some rework? /[[User:Mike\|Mike]] 19:56, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
	::I suggest that we treat the new numbering system just as the old, i.e. the ND-860289.2p should be read as ND-60.289.2p. Whenever we have more than one version of the same manual we should make a small note of the difference as I've done with [[Documentation_list-Software#ND-60.172_THE_DATA_BASE_SYSTEM_-_SIBAS_II_NORD_Users_Manual\|this manual]].<br> I also suggest that we move the 820026 manual to the [[Documentation list-Mixed hardware software]] section. I have some OpenLAN manuals that starts with 23.xxx that also should go into that section. With only one manual so far in that category it is hard to decide what to call the 20.xxx group so I think we just leave it with the number.--[[User:Gandalf\|Gandalf]] 07:21, 23 September 2009 (UTC)		::I suggest that we treat the new numbering system just as the old, i.e. the ND-860289.2p should be read as ND-60.289.2p. Whenever we have more than one version of the same manual we should make a small note of the difference as I've done with [[Documentation_list-Software#ND-60.172_THE_DATA_BASE_SYSTEM_-_SIBAS_II_NORD_Users_Manual\|this manual]].<br> I also suggest that we move the 820026 manual to the [[Documentation list-Mixed hardware software]] section. I have some OpenLAN manuals that starts with 23.xxx that also should go into that section. With only one manual so far in that category it is hard to decide what to call the 20.xxx group so I think we just leave it with the number.--[[User:Gandalf\|Gandalf]] 07:21, 23 September 2009 (UTC)

			== Two ND-60.204 in the list ==

			There are two ND-60.204 docs in the list? /[[User:Mike\|Mike]] 13:14, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

Gandalf: Re: Manual numbering scheme

2009-09-23T07:21:16Z

Re: Manual numbering scheme

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:21, 23 September 2009
Line 9:		Line 9:
	mentioning in the write-up. Thoughts? [[User:TArntsen\|TArntsen]] 09:27, 22 September 2009 (UTC)		mentioning in the write-up. Thoughts? [[User:TArntsen\|TArntsen]] 09:27, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
	:Hmm. Group them together describing both documents, with their differences or two separate sections, each describing the difference between each other. The documentations lists have been "designed" as the needs have increased. Maybe it's time to do some rework? /[[User:Mike\|Mike]] 19:56, 22 September 2009 (UTC)		:Hmm. Group them together describing both documents, with their differences or two separate sections, each describing the difference between each other. The documentations lists have been "designed" as the needs have increased. Maybe it's time to do some rework? /[[User:Mike\|Mike]] 19:56, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
			::I suggest that we treat the new numbering system just as the old, i.e. the ND-860289.2p should be read as ND-60.289.2p. Whenever we have more than one version of the same manual we should make a small note of the difference as I've done with [[Documentation_list-Software#ND-60.172_THE_DATA_BASE_SYSTEM_-_SIBAS_II_NORD_Users_Manual\|this manual]].<br> I also suggest that we move the 820026 manual to the [[Documentation list-Mixed hardware software]] section. I have some OpenLAN manuals that starts with 23.xxx that also should go into that section. With only one manual so far in that category it is hard to decide what to call the 20.xxx group so I think we just leave it with the number.--[[User:Gandalf\|Gandalf]] 07:21, 23 September 2009 (UTC)

Mike: Answer: Group them or two separate sections

2009-09-22T19:56:10Z

Answer: Group them or two separate sections

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:56, 22 September 2009
Line 8:		Line 8:
	the two versions have some important differences that it would be worth		the two versions have some important differences that it would be worth
	mentioning in the write-up. Thoughts? [[User:TArntsen\|TArntsen]] 09:27, 22 September 2009 (UTC)		mentioning in the write-up. Thoughts? [[User:TArntsen\|TArntsen]] 09:27, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
			:Hmm. Group them together describing both documents, with their differences or two separate sections, each describing the difference between each other. The documentations lists have been "designed" as the needs have increased. Maybe it's time to do some rework? /[[User:Mike\|Mike]] 19:56, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

TArntsen: Q about manuals w/different numbering schemes

2009-09-22T09:27:18Z

Q about manuals w/different numbering schemes

New page

==Describing manuals affected by the numbering change==
I have a question about how to best write up a section for a currently
missing document, ND Linker User Guide and Reference Manual, which
changed its numbering scheme in the transition from .1 to .2 (or .2p,
which is a prelim version that I have). I.e. from 60.289.1 to 860289.2p.
It wouldn't be good to have two different sections I think, even if one
is just referring to the other - particularly for this document, because
the two versions have some important differences that it would be worth
mentioning in the write-up. Thoughts? [[User:TArntsen|TArntsen]] 09:27, 22 September 2009 (UTC)